← Facade Generation

01

Tour Guillot

Facade Generation — MSc Thesis, Facade Renovation Thesis Project

Year

2023

Location

150, cours Albert Thomas, Lyon, France

Role

MSc Thesis — Parametric Facade Design, Performance Analysis, Automated BIM Detailing

Client

Tour Guillot et Auditorium Bourdeix (ex-CIRC) — Reinventing Cities Competition

Team

Giandomenico Azzone, Konstantin Loshkov, Redait Tsegaye Legesse — MSc Thesis, Politecnico di Milano (Advisor: Prof. Gabriele Masera)

Tools

RhinoGrasshopperLadybugHoneybeeArtificial Neural NetworksRhino.Inside.RevitRevit

Site context plan — 150, cours Albert Thomas, Lyon, France
Lyon — France
Street-level render of the renovated Tour Guillot, Lyon

Overview

Tour Guillot is a 1972 office tower in Lyon, built to house the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and known for its lightweight prefabricated facade around a reinforced-concrete service core. The thesis proposes its renovation for the Reinventing Cities competition: replacing the flat, monotonous envelope with twisting rows of bays that respond to environmental conditions, with the interior layout and programming reworked to match. Underneath sits a broader research aim — a parametric workflow that mitigates a building's environmental impact by intervening at the earliest design stages, demonstrated here through the refurbishment of an existing building.

Original fourth-floor plan of Tour Guillot
Original fourth-floor plan
Proposed floor plan following the facade's rotation
Proposed floor plan — following the facade's rotation

A Responsive Facade

The original plan prioritised functionality but ignored cardinal orientation and gave no role to external structural elements. The new facade reverses that: fully glazed lower sections take advantage of shading effects, glazing gradually reduces moving upwards, and individual modules rotate to face favourable directions such as east and west. The lower floors keep office use behind a nearly fully glazed, slightly distorted grid, organised as a free plan through furnishing; the upper floors turn residential, with reduced glazing for a more intimate atmosphere and a plan that follows the facade's rotation while keeping its main spaces rectangular.

Original and proposed facade unit and whole-tower geometry compared
Original (left) and proposed (right) — facade unit and whole-tower geometry
Grid of facade panel variations across the six key parameters
The six key parameters and their effect on the facade's tectonics

A Parametric Workflow

The entire facade geometry is generated in Grasshopper around six parameters — height, distance from the edge, window-to-wall ratio, facade rotation angle, position relative to the whole facade, and main orientation — chosen so every panel's geometric properties can be extracted in real time for the stages that follow. The workflow runs in three stages: facade geometry generation, building-performance optimisation, and translation from the computational model into BIM.

Three-stage parametric workflow diagram — facade geometry, performance optimisation, translation to BIM
The three-stage workflow — from facade geometry to a performance-optimised, BIM-translated panel

Building Performance Optimisation

Existing simulation tools such as Honeybee, Ladybug and DIVA are accurate but slow, which limits how much they can actually inform early design decisions. The thesis instead built a daylight-metric analysis tool aimed at a real-time overview of building performance — Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA), Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE) and photovoltaic energy production, computed per panel across the facade and fed into an artificial neural network trained to predict performance instantly rather than re-run a full simulation each time.

Per-panel sDA, ASE and PV performance visualisations across the facade
sDA, ASE and PV outputs, computed per panel across the facade

Automating the Facade Details

The technological solution assembles each facade unit from four independent components — a prefabricated reinforced-concrete slab extension, a vertical structural insulation unit, the spandrel bay, and the visual/opaque units — installed across two consecutive floors so the interior units can go in afterwards with minimal scaffolding. Drawing that in AutoCAD would mean redrawing every detail by hand whenever the design changed, so the details were rebuilt instead as parametric line-based families in Rhino.Inside.Revit, linked directly to the host geometry: move a slider, and the tagged detail drawing updates itself.

Exploded axonometric of the facade module's four components
Exploded axonometric — the facade module's four components
Plan and section detail of the window-head junction
Window-head junction — plan and section
Isometric of the corner assembly with section-cut callouts
Corner assembly — isometric with section cuts
Grasshopper script and the resulting parametric detail drawing, insulation thickness changed via a number slider
Parametric detail families — insulation thickness driven by a single Grasshopper slider